Kovačić, Marko (2022) Kako bi analiza trebala spasiti Hrvatsku: stvaranje politika utemeljeno na dokazima kao cilj hrvatskih javnih politika. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 22 (3). pp. 495-520. ISSN 1848-0357 (Print), 1849-2150 (Online)
|
Text
HKJU 2022_3 Kovačić.pdf Download (209Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
IN CROATIAN: Ideja je ovog članka doprinijeti literaturi javnih politika empirijskom analizom stvaranja politika utemeljenog na dokazima (SPUD). Fokusirajući se na analizu elemenata SPUD-a u 11 hrvatskih javnih politika, članak ima za cilj odgovoriti na vrlo jednostavno, no dosad neistraženo pitanje – što je SPUD u Hrvatskoj? Koristeći se kvalitativnom analizom sadržaja i ekstrapoliravši 13 potkategorija SPUDa, tekst dekonstruira elemente tog pristupa u hrvatskom kontekstu te zaključuje da je, iako numerički prevalentan, SPUD u hrvatskim javnopolitičkim strategijama više deklaratorno nego sadržajno razrađeno načelo stvaranja javnih politika. Premda provedena analiza nije sveobuhvatna, ona zasigurno upućuje na neke od tendencija stvaranja hrvatskih javnih politika te kao takva može služiti kao smjernica akterima u budućim procesima te vrste. S obzirom na činjenicu da je tema stvaranja politika utemeljenog na dokazima sveprisutna u javnopolitičkim raspravama, no u isto vrijeme nedovoljno analizirana, ovaj tekst doprinosi boljem razumijevanju ne samo SPUD-a već i stvaranju javnih politika. --------------- IN ENGLISH: Evidence-based policy making is a kind of standard in contemporary public policy making. This prescriptivist approach, which at its core inherits the rational tradition of policy analysis, is, however, rather contradictory. While in practice it is almost ubiquitous and unquestionable, academic discussions on the justification and expediency of evidence-based policy making (EBPM) are very present and varied. The literature on evidence-based policy making focuses on defining knowledge, classifying and determining evidence, and analysing the actors that could conduct evidence-based policy making, but all of these academic debates are predominantly theoretical in nature. Empirical studies that would help resolve doubts about the nature of knowledge, the type of evidence, and the modus of cooperation between actors within the evidence-based policy-making framework are very rare. This article aims to contribute to the public policy literature through an empirical analysis of evidence-based policy making. Focusing on the analysis of the subcategories of the EBPM in 11 Croatian public policies, the article seeks to answer a very simple but hitherto unexplored question - what is evidence-based policy making in Croatia? By using qualitative content analysis and extrapolating 13 subcategories of evidence-based policy making, the text deconstructs the elements of this approach in the Croatian context and concludes that although numerically prevalent, evidence-based policy making is a declarative rather than actual principle in Croatian public policy strategies. Although the conducted analysis is not comprehensive, it certainly indicates some of the tendencies in the creation of Croatian public policies and as such can serve as a guideline for actors in future policy-making processes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Language: Croatian. - Title in English: How analysis should save Croatia: evidence-based policy making as the goal of croatian public policies. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Dokaz, kvalitativna analiza sadržaja, strateški dokumenti, stvaranje politika, znanje (evidence, evidence-based policy making, knowledge, qualitative content analysis, strategic documents) |
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
| Depositing User: | Karolina |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Nov 2022 11:45 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Nov 2022 11:45 |
| URI: | http://idiprints.knjiznica.idi.hr/id/eprint/1052 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
