Domazet, Mladen (2006) Einsteinova sinkronizacija i konvencionalnost istovremenosti. Prolegomena, 5 (1). pp. 53-64. ISSN 1333-4395 (Print), 1846-0593 (Online)
|
Text
P 2006_1 Domazet.pdf Download (89Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Unatoč naslovu koji pokriva iznimno opširno područje, članak se usredotočuje na blisko pitanje da li Specijalna teorija relativnosti (STR) nužno zagovara ukidanje ontološke razlike između prošlih i budućih događaja, između prošlosti i budućnosti općenito. Izraženo žargonom koji uvodi Stein: jesmo li u okviru STR prinuđeni birati isključivo između ‘solipsizma’ i ‘determinizma’? Posebice će biti riječi o ulozi koju konvencionalnost istovremenosti u STR ima u pokušaju odgovora na ovo pitanje. Standardni argumenti pozivaju se na relativnost istovremenosti, tvrdnju da STR negira postojanje univerzalne ‘sadašnjosti’ koja razgraničava ‘prošlost’ i ‘budućnost’, kako bi pokazali da nema ontološke razlike između prošlosti i budućnosti, da su obje jednako određene/zbiljne (determinizam). Pritom se prešutno prelazi preko činjenice da je za uspostavu ontoloških tvrdnji vezanih uz relativnost istovremenosti potrebno prvo riješiti pitanje konvencionalnosti istovremenosti u okviru STR. U članku će se nastojati pokazati da promatranjem pitanja konvencionalnosti istovremenosti iz perspektive ‘čisto filozofskog’ Dummettovog određenja razlike između prošlosti i budućnosti možemo u okviru STR pokušati razviti shvaćanje razlikovanja prošlosti i budućnosti mimo (nepoželjne) stroge ontološke dihotomije ‘solipsizam’/‘determinizam’, ukoliko kriterij koji postavlja STR shvatimo kao epistemički, a ne kao ontološki. (IN ENGLISH: Despite a broad-range title the paper settles for the related issue of whether the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) necessarily advocates the demise of an ontological difference between past and future events, between past and future in general. In the jargon of H. Stein: are we forced, within the framework of the STR, to choose only between ‘solipsism’ and ‘determinism’ exclusively? A special emphasis is placed on the role that the conventionality of simultaneity plays in the STR with regards to this question. The standard arguments rely on the relativity of simultaneity, the claim that the STR negates the existence of a universal ‘present’ that divides the ‘past’ and the ‘future’, so as to conclude that there is no ontological difference between past and future events, that both are equally determined/real (‘determinism’). This often neglects the fact that to establish the ontological claims related to relativity of simultaneity, one must first resolve the issues of conventionality of simultaneity within the STR. The paper will aim to show that by addressing the issue of conventionality from Dummett’s ‘purely philosophical’ determination of the difference between the past and the future, we develop an understanding of the said difference, within the framework of the STR, beyond the (unwanted) strict ontological dichotomy of ‘solipsism/determinism’, given that the criterion that is provided by the STR is understood as epistemic and not ontological.)
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Language: Croatian. - Title in English: Einstein synchronisation and the conventionality of simlutaneity. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Blok-svemir, Einsteinova sinkronizacija, jednosmjerna brzina svjetlosti, konvencionalnost i relativnost istovremenosti, protočnost vremena, retrogradno uzrokovanje, Specijalna teorija relativnosti (Block-universe, Einstein’ s synchronisation, one-way speed of light, conventionality and relativity of simultaneity, flow of time, retrograde causation, Special Theory of Relativity) |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) Q Science > QC Physics |
| Depositing User: | Karolina |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Dec 2016 11:17 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Dec 2016 11:24 |
| URI: | http://idiprints.knjiznica.idi.hr/id/eprint/540 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
